Star Chamber Proceedings

 

You are here: Home Wilfred Hathway     Next Page Curtis Malinowsk

 

The RCMP Mr Big Sting

Judgement

R. v. Hathway Allbright   pdf

Hathway sentenced in killing of landlord
 Lengthy remand time shortens stint behind bars
 By Lori Coolican

November 29, 2008

Wilfred Hathway gets 11-and-a-half year prison sentence
Was charged in 2004 in the stabbing death of 84-year-old landlord Denver Crawford
TheStarPhoenix.com
Published: Friday, November 28, 2008
 

A judge has handed down an 11-and-a-half year prison sentence for Wilfred Gordon Hathway, who pleaded guilty to manslaughter earlier this month in the 1998 death of his 84-year-old landlord, Denver Crawford.

Hathway will get credit for seven-and-a-half years for time spent in custody. It is unknown at this point how much of the four years he will have to serve before he can obtain statutory release.

Hathway has been on remand for almost four-and-a-half years. Pretrial custody in the provincial jail is traditionally counted as double time served during sentencing because of the harsh conditions, including crowded facilities and lack of rehabilitation programming.

Hathway, 49, was charged in May 2004 in the stabbing death of Crawford, after RCMP in British Columbia gathered evidence supporting the charge.

Crawford was found dead in his Broadway-area house on May 13, 1998. Hathway was one of several people who had lived in suites on the second and third floors of the Ninth Street house. Hathway had been identified as a suspect during the original investigation but police did not obtain enough evidence to lay a charge.

The Crown accepted the guilty plea to the reduced charge after evaluating the evidence, which included witnesses saying Hathway was "extremely intoxicated," prosecutor Brent Klause said at the time of the guilty plea.

The Crown had put forward the first-degree murder case because Hathway told undercover RCMP officers the killing was deliberate, Klause said.

Hathway maintains he doesn't remember the event, but acknowledges he caused Crawford's death, Klause said.

© The StarPhoenix 2008

Wilfred Gordon Hathway pleads guilty to manslaughter
TheStarPhoenix.com
Published: Monday, November 03, 2008

Saskatoon man pleads guilty in killing of landlord 10 years ago

CBC News and comments

Scrappy accused's guilty plea a stunning twist
Les MacPherson, The StarPhoenix
Published: Thursday, November 06, 2008

Hathway on "a bender" the night of killing
Betty Ann Adam, The StarPhoenix.com
Published: Thursday, November 13, 2008

Wilfred Hathway: Next Court Date

Tuesday March 20, 2007 10 AM

Wilfred Hathway testified all day Monday and will continue on Tuesday, March 20 at 10 AM. 

Wilfred Hathway hearing at Saskatchewan Justice.ca or Justice Hrabinsky.com.  The Voice of Reason

Wilfred Hathway: Next Court Date
The hearing will continue at 10 AM Wednesday March 21, 2007 at the Saskatoon Court of Queen’s Bench.

The Hathway hearing was postponed from 10 AM on Tuesday until 2 PM.  A lock down at the correction facility prevented Mr Hathway’s transportation to court. Mr Hathway continued his testimony at 2 PM. It would be wise to call the court registry before proceedings to court. 

Hathway Hearing

March 13, 2007

The Wilfred Hathway Hearing will continue before Mr Justice Allbright on March 13, 2007 and will deal with preliminary matters re: witness etc with Wilfred Hathway in attendance.

The Saskatchewan College of Law needs to post a notice to students that the ethics class will continue in Mr Justice Allbright’s court room and the kangaroo classes will continue in Justice Paul Hrabinsky, Justice Malone, Madam Justice Dovell and Madam Justice G A Smith’s court rooms.

The children have stopped playing in court, it is refreshing to witness court proceedings conducted in a fair and respectful manner in a Saskatchewan court room.

Wilfred Hathway
Update: RCMP Mr Big

Rely on the national news media for our local news

The lengthy post on injusticebusters regarding the hearing on March 7, 2007 before Mr Justice Allbright can be shortened considerably. Mr Hathway filed a detailed affidavit. He will take the stand and his lawyer will question him. The Crown will then cross-examine Mr Hathway on the contents of his affidavit and everything that is relevant including past criminal record etc. If Mr Hathway does not take the stand it will end.

It has been clear during the past proceedings that the Crown is very adapt at pushing Mr Hathway’s buttons. Mr Hathway is more then capable of pushing back by “yelling for justice” for close to three years. The post on injusticebusters has left me wondering if it is just the Crown who is adapt at pushing Mr Hathway’s buttons? It would be very hard for anyone to keep control of themselves under these circumstances. It would be all the more difficult for Mr Hathway if in fact he is innocent as he claims. If the Crown believes Mr Hathway is guilty an aggressive cross is what the people should expect from a prosecutor representing the victim.

I think it is clear to anyone that has witnessed the proceedings that Mr Hathway is not the fool he has been made out to be in the past biased articles published in the StarPhoenix. I also think that everyone who engaged in the past court proceeding as described in the StarPhoenix need to remember who the professionals are.

Mr Hathway is well spoken and intelligent when he is not being insulted, or insulting. Everyone in the court room needs to have the same attitude and respect as has been shown by Mr Justice Allbright. This case has the potential of restoring public confidence in the administration of justice in Saskatchewan.

The national news media will be in attendance. The citizens of Saskatoon will again have to rely on the national news media for our local news.

The Wilfred Hathway Hearing will continue on Wednesday March 7, 2007 at 10:00 AM.

Previous court proceedings best described as a zoo have ended. Mr Hathway has a lawyer.

I can understand why Mr Hathway would not trust a lawyer, or the court process after hearing his lengthy list of alleged Charter violations.  Mr Hathway needs to be have his trust restored in a justice system that has demonstrated by, threats, intimidation, gagging and sealing the evidence that the only issue is the publics image of the courts.

If one of the Charter violations is found to be true the gag orders should be removed. The public has a right to see that justice is done.  It is not only Mr Hathway that has lost confidence in Saskatchewan Justice. The public has been waiting for over three years for the judgement of the Court of Appeal of a Crown prosecutor found guilty of malicious prosecution in Saskatoon.   The over sixteen year cover-up by the Government of Saskatchewan and Saskatchewan Justice has no limitation period.   There is no limitation on the voting age of the public.  It will not be Saskatchewan’s corrupt judges that pay the price of injustice in Saskatchewan, it will be the silent politicians.

What a difference a lawyer makes.  The court proceedings were conducted in a manner respectful of the law.  The cheap shots by the Crown need to end. The childish remarks from the second senior prosecutor with respect to witness subpoenas ended when Justice Allbright told him to have any defence witness call the court registry for information.  The Crown should not be talking to defence witness prior to them being sworn. After witnessing the proceeding on Monday I have to ask, who the hell is representing Denver Crawford?

The hearing will hear witness in three parts.  First, the investigation by the Saskatoon Police Service. Second the RCMP Mr Big Sting. Third the proceedings to date.

There is no case law as a guide for the proceedings. The proceedings and Justice Allbrights decision could open the front door of Canadian court rooms for Canadians, notwithstanding the complete failure of elected politicians to protect our Charter Rights.

The Hathway Hearing is the first step in restoring the confidence of Canadians in a just society for our children and grandchildren. You should be in the court room.

Hathway: Hrabinsky

The involvement of Justice Paul Hrabinsky in the Hathway case should be ringing alarm bells in Saskatoon. This corrupt judge has been protecting corrupt officers of the court for over 16 years in Saskatoon.

Everyone knows this, including the editors of the Saskatoon StarPhoenix who’s newspaper relies on the advertising of government and Crown Corporations. Documented proof of this corruption can be ignored by the StarPhoenix, but it can not be disputed.

 

Wilfred Hathway

Attend the Hathway Hearing

The Wilfred Hathway hearing at the Court of Queen Bench in Saskatoon on March 5, 2007, 10:00 A.M. may well be a insight into the workings of a corrupt administration of justice in Saskatoon. No one in Canada is safe. This case should be a concern for all Canadians when one considers that a Saskatoon Police Officer, Brian Dueck, arrested Canadians outside of Saskatchewan after manufacturing his case. He was later found guilty of malicious prosecution.

Millions were spent by the City of Saskatoon, Social Services and Saskatchewan Justice to protect Brian Dueck, social workers and judges who left the 8 year old Ross Twin to be raped for four years. The millions were not used to protect Brian Dueck, it was spent to protect directors of government departments and corrupt judges who helped him manufacture his case.

Brian Dueck’s manufactured case resulted in a cover-up by Saskatchewan Justice. Case law written by radical religious nutcase judges in Saskatchewan not only resulted in innocent people being jailed. It resulted in flawed case law that has effected all Canadians.

Brian Dueck’s manufactured case was exposed when government documents sealed by corrupt judges and withheld from the accused were distributed on the streets in downtown Saskatoon. All the judges involved were claiming they did not read the documents. They were bragging about not reading the evidence all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada. They left a trail of destroyed lives by gagging the innocent and sealing the evidence. The only logical conclusion for their junk case law is that they read the evidence. It was not just Brian Dueck that left two 8 year old seriously dysfunctional twin girls to raped in Saskatoon for four years.

How many more manufactured cases are there in Saskatoon? Was the destruction of the Vopni family another case of religious fools on a witch hunt? Gagging the media and sealing documents does not only protect the accused in Canada. It is being used to protects a corrupt administration of justice.

Attend the Hathway Hearing

 

Hathway Case In Saskatoon

Ihave been unable to obtain any information on the Hathway case. Last I heard he had a disclosure hearing last December. There has been nothing posted on the law society web site and nothing in the Saskatoon StarPhoenix. He has been in jail for over two years and has still not received a full disclosure from the Crown?

Fact is in Saskatchewan a lawyer can not do their job without reprisals from Saskatchewan Justice and their so called Law Society. Mr Hathway is entitled under the law to a full disclosure from the Crown. This should be a concern for the editors of the StarPhoenix.

The David Milgaard Nightmare, The Ross, Ross & White Ritual Satanic Child Abuse case, the Martinsville Nightmare, The Kvello Nightmare, the Klassen Nightmare, the Vopni Family Nightmare, the Johanna Lucas and John Lucas Nightmare were all malicious prosecutions but the most disgusting case is the dismissal by Justice Dovell of the Michael London Ross claim.

Disclosure was withheld by the Crown in all the above cases. The Government of Saskatchewan is represented in civil cases filed for damages by a Crown prosecutor. This is understandable when one sees all the government and Crown Corporation advertising in the StarPhoenix. - Photo: Greg Pender, The StarPhoenix

The publication bans have successfully banned the public from hearing any of the evidence in this case. It is times like this when the voice of injusticebusters is missed. There was a time when publication bans were not needed in cases before the court. The media in the past would not think of publishing information that would expose a witness, child or victim’s name. The evidence was not protected, the public had a right to know.

The media outlets of today have less credibility then the courts. The StarPhoenix biased reporting about Mr Hathway’s demeanour and his outspoken manner has been one-sided. What has this got to do with the case, what has a judge rolling her eyes back got to do with the case. Mr Hathway is not deserving of the reporting that badly reflects on his character because the StarPhoenix has been banned from reporting anything else. Mr Hathway has been saying loudly that he is innocent and being maliciously prosecuted. He has no other choice. His lawyers have not done their jobs.”

It is not just the lawyers

 

The Hathway case in Saskatoon is another example of injustice in Canada. I have no idea if Mr Hathway is guilty or innocent.  I have one interest only.  A fair trial for Mr Hathway.

When justice takes a wrong turn in Canada it is not the responsibility of non-lawyers paid by Mr Hathway’s family and supporters to represent Mr Hathway in court proceedings.    It is the responsibility of the federal justice department.

The administration of justice is corrupt in Saskatchewan.  That disturbing statement is not disputed by judges of the Court of Queen’s Bench. If the information posted on injusticebusters about the undercover RCMP officer is true the federal justice department must intervene in the Hathway case.

When high ranking RCMP officers protect the illegal activates of RCMP officers under their command, and this information is known to the pre-trial judges there must be a stay of proceedings or the appointment of a trial judge to hear any further proceedings.

Proceeding will place the administration of justice into disrepute and further damage the creditably of the Court of Queen’s Bench, the RCMP and Saskatchewan justice.

Any investigation must include the publication bans and the actions of the Chief Justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench and the Saskatchewan Law Society’s failed attempt to rule by fiat.

The fact that one does not have Charter Rights in Saskatchewan can not be disputed.  The practice directives issued by the former Chief Justice of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal during the nineteen eighties were justified by the Chief justice because without his practise directives there would be a flood of non-lawyers wanting into the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal, and he did not have the judges or the financial resources to handle the number of Saskatchewan citizens demanding their Charter Right of access to his court.   It was an honest statement. It is not just Saskatchewan health and education employees that suffer under a corrupt civil service that is under funded and mismanaged in Saskatchewan.

Mr Hathway’s family should not have to pay thousands to non-lawyers to protect Mr Hathway’s Charter Rights to a fair trial. 

A fair trial for Wilfred Hathway.

The Hathway case in Saskatoon is another example of injustice in Canada. I have no idea if Mr Hathway is guilty or innocent.  I have one interest only. A fair trial for Mr Hathway.

When justice takes a wrong turn in Canada it is not the responsibility of non-lawyers paid by Mr Hathway’s family and supporters to represent Mr Hathway in court proceedings.   It is the responsibility of the federal justice department.

The administration of justice is corrupt in Saskatchewan.  That disturbing statement is not disputed by judges of the Court of Queen’s Bench. If the information posted on injusticebusters about the undercover RCMP officer is true the federal justice department must intervene in the Hathway case.

When high ranking RCMP officers protect the illegal activates of RCMP officers under their command, and this information is known to the pre-trial judges there must be a stay of proceedings or the appointment of a trial judge to hear any further proceedings.

Proceeding will place the administration of justice into disrepute and further damage the creditably of the Court of Queen’s Bench, the RCMP and Saskatchewan justice.

Any investigation must include the publication bans and the actions of the Chief Justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench and the Saskatchewan Law Society’s failed attempt to rule by fiat.

The fact that one does not have Charter Rights in Saskatchewan can not be disputed.  The practice directives issued by the former Chief Justice of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal during the nineteen eighties were justified by the Chief justice because without his practise directives there would be a flood of non-lawyers wanting into the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal, and he did not have the judges or the financial resources to handle the number of Saskatchewan citizens demanding their Charter Right of access to his court. It was an honest statement.  It is not just Saskatchewan health and education employees that suffer under a corrupt civil service that is under funded and mismanaged in Saskatchewan.

Mr Hathway’s family should not have to pay thousands to non-lawyers to protect Mr Hathway’s Charter Rights to a fair trial.

Wilfred Hathway has been denied bail.

It is difficult to obtain information on the Hathway case in Saskatoon.  We continue to here that the Crown and police have done this and that but we are not allowed to hear what they are being accused of doing.   This can not be reported on because of court ordered bans on publication.

The John Lucas case the Crown manufactured a threat that keep him in jail. Justice Hrabinsky and Justice Malone had previously attempted to have Mr Lucas apprehended on April 17th, 2002 by manufacturing a false complaint to the Saskatoon police. The former chief justice then appointed Justice Malone as the trial judge. John Lucas is charged with defamatory libel. The complainant is Justice Hrabinsky.  The administration of justice in Saskatchewan is corrupt.

The following was taken from saskatchewanjustice.ca. 

 This is in a letter to the Crown prosecutor:

I also want you to reconsider your position regarding Mr. Justice Malone. The evidence makes it very clear that he attempted to corrupt these proceedings when he accepted the position of trial judge, without reporting his involvement in the April 17th, 2002, affair. While I have no intention at the moment of requesting a subpoena for Mr. Justice Kyle, I do intend on calling some of those that were included on his “some of these people are my friends”, list… The sickening pattern of behaviour by some members of the Law Society and Queen’s Bench has become clear & was probably the reason why Mr. Justice Krueger, with the full support of Mr. Justice Allbright, requested that his Chief Justice have this matter removed from the Court’s jurisdiction.

The following was taken from Mr Luca’s Affidavit to be heard by Justice Ball at 11 AM September 6th at the Court of Queen’s Bench in Saskatoon. 

21. A corrupt Hrabinsky, successfully got Mr. Justice Malone directly involved in trying to have me apprehended, on April 17th, 2002. The fact that an involved Chief Justice, would then select Mr. Justice Malone to be the “trial judge”, was corrupt. The fact that he is trying to avoid giving evidence at my trial, should also be considered, corrupt. The fact that a claim was made by Mr. Kalmakoff, that a deputy police chief did not take notes, or keep a file, when he is phoned by Mr. Justice Malone, about another Justice who claimed that this accused, endangered his family, makes this entire proceeding corrupt.

These gag orders and publication bans need to be stopped. The argument that they protect the accused may be true in a just court.  The deplorable history of Court of Queen’s Bench Judges and Saskatchewan Justice is in its self reason enough to end these bans and gag orders. They do not protect the accused, they protect corrupt judges and Saskatchewan Justice.

The right of the public to information about the courts comes before protecting a corrupt judge, police officer or officer of the court.

Hathway: A full voir dire, MARCH 5, 2007, 10:00 A.M.

There are a lot of questions being asked about the Hathway case in Saskatoon.  The question being asked by people with a belief in truth and justice is: “What can we do“.

You will not read the details of the hearing in the Saskatoon StarPhoenix because of the publication bans.

If the information posted on injusticebusters is true the public has a right to know.  This is not about the petty differences reported in the StarPhoenix.

The RCMP officer reported on injusticebusters to be involved with former provincial court judge David Ramsay, who was found guilty of sex abuse crimes against children in Prince George B.C. should not be allowed to testify, in the Hathway case, or any other case until a full investigation is done that includes any cover-up by the RCMP. 

If the information posted on injusticebusters is not true, or if the Crown is blindsided, then Mr Justice Allbright needs to appoint legal representation for Mr Hathway.  

If the information is true, manufacturing a criminal case is illegal.  Mr Hathway should be released on bail and a criminal investigation started that is open to the public. 

A full voir dire hearing is unusual, there must be a reason.

All of the petty differences should be set aside.  I have had my share of disagreements with the Hathway defence team that are minor when compared to justice for Mr Wilfred Hathway.  

If Mr Hathway walks out of the court room there is a hero, a fitting remembrance for Sheila Rose Steele would be the solidarity of a court room full of silent believers in truth and justice.

The Court of Queen’s Bench, March 5, 2007 at 10:00 A.M.
R v. Wilfred Hathway

Links to Posts on The Star Chamber Blog
Wilfred Gordon Hathway
  • Hathway: W5 is a must see.
  • W5: Methods used to catch criminals by RCMP
  • Hathway: Standing your ground in a corrupt court.
  • Hathway& John Lucas: Creditability of the Court of Queen’s bench is in Question.
  • Are they going to cut Hathway’s foreskin off?
  • Hathway: Corruption and Malice
  • Hathway: Saskatoon’s ongoing legal folly’s
  • Lucas & Hathway: Lawyers Needed in Saskatchewan
  • Hathway: CTV's W-Five
  • Hathway: Motion Chief Justice R D Lang
  • Crown warns Hathway to hire a “real lawyer“
  • Mr Hathway needs to start eating.
  • Wilfred Hathway: Who is in charge in this court room?
  • Wilfred Hathway: Was the confession voluntary?
  • Hathway case and the media.
  • Yelling for justice - Wilfred Hathway
  • "Cough 'em up Klause. Cough 'em up,"
  • Wilfred Hathway case

    •  

    “They defamed him.”

    At the Hathway hearing on March 20, 2007 I was at the back entrance of the Court of Queen’s Bench in Saskatoon.  A news reporter who had been attending the Hathway hearing exited the court house and quickly disappeared down the back alley.  This same reporter also attended the malicious prosecution trial of Johanna Lucas in 1995.

    “They defamed him.” “They defamed him,” was her squealing response after Justice Hrabinsky found Johanna and John Lucas guilty of defaming the now disgraced Saskatoon Police Officer,  Brian Dueck.  A 16 year media embarrassment in Saskatoon continues with the media silence in the Hathway case.

    Its time to take the Shakespeare on the Saskatchewan tent down and move it to the park across the street from The Court of Queens Bench and rename it, The Old Fools on the Saskatchewan.

    John Lucas posted thousands of posters in downtown Saskatoon to warn the public that the 8 year old Ross twins were being raped in a Saskatoon foster home with the full knowledge of the authorities. This is a story that needs to be told. The proceeds from The Old Fools on the Saskatchewan should be evenly divided between the three Ross children.  Guided walking tours after the performance through the downtown, and the back alley of the court house to view the history still visible on the poles and garbage containers with the names of the perverts who left children to be raped. These people still work for Saskatchewan Justice and are responsible for the 16 year cover-up of the Ross, Ross & White and Kvello/Richard Klassen malicious prosecutions.

    The Ross Twins were not the only ones to be abused.  Johanna Lucas was jailed because she picketed to try and help all three Ross children after contacting Saskatchewan’s spineless authorities.  Less then one hour after completing his 18 month sentence John Lucas was gluing posters on poles during the Saskatoon Police Service pancake breakfast on forth avenue.  He posted on both sides of the street in a city where his wife was jailed in corrupt court proceedings and not one of the police officers stopped him. I believe some of the police officers would have cooked him up a stack of pancakes if he asked.

    The law students at the Saskatoon College of Law are missing a rare occurrence taking place in The Court of Queen’s Bench in Saskatoon. A fair hearing for Wilfred Hathway. 

    [Home Page] [Kvello v Miazga] [R v. John Kelly] [Q.B. No. 616, 2007] [About this web site] [News] [Ross Twins Settlement] [Abuse of Power] [Blackmail] [Casinternment] [Documents] [John & Johanna Lucas] [Wilfred  Hathway] [Curtis Malinowsk] [Saskatchewanjustice.ca] [Court Cases] [Builders Lien Scam] [James Hunter About Me] [The Rule of Law] [Lawyers] [Criminal Code] [Links] [Cornwall Public Inquiry] [Where Fools Rush In] [Saskatchewan Courts] [Satanic Ritual Abuse] [Updates by Month]
    saskatchewanjustice.ca Home Page

    Search Star Chamber Proceedings

    Search This Site and all related sites

     

     
    [EFC Blue Ribbon - Free Speech Online]

     

    Updates by Month
    BuiltWithNOF
    Star Chamber Blog

     

     
    9780670065042L
    Paladin of Common Law